Raw tennis-book intel
All 32 book sources used as gap-analysis evidence are mirrored here viewable as-is. Each page carries the YAML frontmatter from the original analysis pass plus the first ~1000 words of the actual book extract, so you can verify exactly what the synthesizer saw.
Total: 32 files across 7 domains
By domain
biomechanics (2 files)
- The Double Pendulum In Tennis (Rod Cross, 2011)
- Review of Tennis Ball Aerodynamics (Mehta et al., 2008)
serve (3 files)
- Physics of the Tennis Kick Serve (Rod Cross)
- The Kick Serve (companion text)
- Absolute Tennis — Ch. 12 Future Strokes (Marty Smith, 2017)
equipment (3 files)
- Sweet Spot / Center of Percussion Physics
- Kotze et al. 2001 — Role of the Racket in High-Speed Serves
- Free Forehand (Revolution Tennis)
training (6 files)
- Science and Application of HIIT (Laursen & Buchheit, 2019)
- Special Strength Development for All Sports (Louie Simmons, 2015)
- Tennis Course Vol. 2 — Lessons and Training (BTV/VDT)
- Tennis Fitness for the Love of It
- Plantar Fasciitis in Tennis
- The Talent Code (Daniel Coyle)
mental-game (5 files)
- Aspetar Sports Medicine Journal 2024 — Wheelchair Tennis & the Yips
- Vic Braden's Laugh and Win at Doubles (Vietnamese edition)
- The Tao of Tennis
- The Soft Science of Tennis
- Zen Tennis
- Chasing Points (Gregory Howe)
history (4 files)
- A Brief History of Tennis
- Advantage Canada: A Tennis Centenary
- Carlos Alcaraz — Player Profile
- Trailblazers: Billie Jean King
coaching (7 files)
- ITF Level 2 Coaching Curriculum
- Learn Tennis as an Open Skill Sport (Wayne Elderton)
- Movement for Tennis
- Coaching Tennis Successfully
- Acquiring Vision Skills Essential for Tennis
- Revolution Tennis — Vision Drills
- Technical Tennis
- Basic Rules of Tennis and Miscellaneous Information
Status legend
Each file's frontmatter includes:
synthesis_status: done— the book has been incorporated into one or more gap reports.synthesis_target: reports/tier-X-...— which tier report cites it.artifact_ref: artifacts/...— the actual report path.relevance— 0.0–1.0 score for how strongly the book supports the gap thesis.
Trang web này được xây dựng với ❤️ cho cộng đồng quần vợt Việt Nam 🎾 by Henry Phạm